Search:
Article Blog Poster

| Home | Recreation And Leisure | Sport | Golf


Understanding the "Stack and Tilt" Golf Swing



Click the XML Icon Above to Receive Golf Articles Via RSS!


In a recent issue of Golf Digest (June 2007) a "new" golf swing being promoted by golf coaches Andy Plummer and Mike Bennett is featured. This new approach to the golf swing is called the "Stack and Tilt" swing.

The author of the article indulges in a bit of exaggeration when he says "Their secret...contradicts almost everything being taught in the game today." But there are some interesting differences with the Stack and Tilt swing, and they are worth trying to understand if you want to better your golf game.

The Major Difference

The biggest difference with the "Stack and Tilt" swing is that it completely downplays the idea of shifting your weight to your back foot when making the backswing. In fact this "new" swing encourages the golfer to keep his or her weight on the front foot, and, if anything, move it more directly over the front foot during the takeaway.

Some older golfers will think this looks like a "reverse pivot" where the golfer seems to be leaning towards the target at the top of the swing. Teachers of the typical modern swing have their golf students draw the club back and stack their weight over their back leg when the club hits the top of the swing. But Stack and Tilt encourages the golfer to lean towards the target while the club is taken up.

Some Subtle Differences

It may be hard for many golfers to spot the differences at first, but some of these differences are significant. For one thing teachers of the typical modern swing want the back leg to remain slightly flexed at the knee. But with the Stack and Tilt swing the back leg straightens out as it pushes back towards the target. See the photos featured in the Golf Digest article on page 122.

This means that the front side of the body is "stacked" over the front leg, and the trailing side of the body from leg up through torso is "tilted" towards the target.

For a comparison with the typical modern swing look at photos of Tiger's swing of the last few years, or see the photo of V.J. Singh's swing on page 43 of the same issue of Golf Digest. Singh's upper body is "stacked" over his back leg at the top of the swing, and the trailing side of his torso is perpendicular to the ground as he pushes his weight back over his back leg. This is quite different from the way the torso is angled towards the target with the Stack and Tilt swing.

Shades of the Past

This forward lean may sound like a radical departure from what has become golf orthodoxy. But the fact is, the modern orthodox swing is a relatively new invention and there have always been alternative schools of thought which questioned the simplistic "weight shift" idea. For example, look at old photos of Byron Nelson, Jack Nicklaus, Ben Hogan or Sam Snead. These golfers do not make the major shift over the back leg like you see with Tiger Woods, for instance.

Or look closely at the famous 1930s teaching videos featuring Bobby Jones. He does not shift his weight to the back either. He remains centered over the ball throughout the swing and has a much more obvious focus on rotation around the center point rather than the lateral weight shift promoted by most well known modern teachers.

Can This Stack and Tilt Help the Average Golfer?

There are several interesting points made by the the Stack and Tilt advocates which may help the average golfer hit the golf ball more squarely and (perhaps) more powerfully.

The first is the lack of emphasis placed on the weight shift. For many golfers this idea is misleading and results in a lateral shift that basically turns the golf ball into a moving target. Shifting one's weight to the back also results in a "shallower" swing which increases the chances of bottoming out too early. Depending on a variety of factors this can either result in fat shots or thin ones. As an alternative, pressing into the front foot as you take the club back very definitely forces a steeper approach to the ball and should result in fewer topped shots. It also results in a lower trajectory since it de-lofts the club, and this may give you greater run on certain kinds of fairways.

The second point is that Stack and Tilt promotes a flatter swing. A flatter swing is less vertical and more rotational, and is the way Stack and Tilt compensates for being more on top of the ball when the downswing is begun.

And third there is the intriguing idea of the "pelvic thrust" which the Stack and Tilt guys claim is necessary for a couple of interesting mechanical reasons. The most important one is that since one's weight and shoulder position are forward, the approach to the ball will be significantly steeper than normal. In order to "shallow out" the swing you have to whip your hips around and thrust your lead hip up and towards the target. This makes you feel like you are almost jumping up and striking the ball while on your toes. If you have seen those photos of Natalie Golbus or Sergio Garcia, or a younger Gary Player you have some idea what they are talking about.

If these seem like subtle differences to you, give the "weight forward" idea a try. You will see that it feels quite different from what you are used to. The biggest difference in your game will probably be fewer thin hits. But it may also result in pushes, especially with the longer clubs. You may also find it more physically taxing - requiring more body contortions - and it's questionable whether that can be a good thing.

Article Source: http://www.articles.ask-me-about.com

Rick Hendershot is an avid golfer who blogs about golf swing theory and golf travel. Read his blogs called The WEG and Golf Around the World.
Feel free to grab a unique version of this article from the stack and tilt Articles Submissions Service

http://www.ask-me-about.com » Copyright © 2006 - 2007
Terms of Service | Submission Guidelines | Contact Us | Link to Us| Privacy Policy | About Us | Sitemap

Powered by Article Dashboard